Over 59615

Losers Politics


TAGS: liberals socialists progressives sad pathetic zombie losers
Rating: 4.02/5

More politifakes by WTFO

GrouchoMarxist - September 15, 2012, 6:26 am



TAGS: losers
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by OTC


WALKER WINS- SORE LOSERS WHINE - Are the Democratic politicians going to hide out of state in hotel rooms again like they did before?

OBAMA'S GREEN ENERGY POLICY - 1: Donors give Obama their Green for his campaign warchest. 2: Obama gives them our green in return. 3: Green company takes our green and folds

TAGS: green policy losers not winners
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - October 11, 2012, 10:59 pm
its called cronyism
arnnatz - October 11, 2012, 9:54 am
sounds legit

THE 2ND WORST PRESIDENT EVER - At least Jimmy married a nice looking lady Not like the giant cow the worst president married, right Barrack???


The world is watching -

Democrats Retreat From Reality -

The Face You Make -

STATISTICS - They don't lie.

GOOD LIBERAL - Q: hear the one about the good liberal A: Me neither


$15 minimum wage -

$90 BILLION - Picking not winners and losers but losers, that also happen to be his campaign contributors. Grand Slam Home run for Romney


5 years of Obama -


COULD BE A LIBERAL - If your friends served in Viet Nam and You served in Canada

A TEXAS GOVERNOR FOR POTUS - What could possibly go wrong?

FROM THE OBAMA PLAY BOOK - Just because you claim something frequently, does not mean we believe it, nor do we think its true!

AND YOU WONDER WHY YOUR @$$ WAS FIRED BY THE PEOPLE - In the background: Mr. "I parked my zillion $ boat in another state to avoid taxes I myself voted for".




TAGS: school is for losers
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by Bull

Renza - May 11, 2013, 10:52 am
lol, I can a**ure you I've come up with better. But that's a pretty stock response for not being able to come up with why the guy was against basically anything useful or positive, the idiocy over wanting to deregulate is one thing, but education... cmon
StoneTools - May 11, 2013, 1:31 am
I believe I could classify that as the single most ignorant statement you've made on this site (at least that I've seen you post)
Renza - May 10, 2013, 9:45 pm
I like how your response to that is regarding the severity of his intent to deregulate rather than trying to deny his opposition to education or building more unnecessary military equipment.
StoneTools - May 10, 2013, 8:17 pm
he didn't say regulation causes problems, he said over-regulation causes issues. Get your facts straight or wean yourself from the comedy channel
Renza - May 10, 2013, 9:39 am
no, I'm referring to him suggesting regulation is what causes problems in this country, him stating that education would be gone with his budget, and him saying we would build more military equipment as part of his budget.
StoneTools - May 10, 2013, 8:46 am
that's the liberal spin. Here's another side of it: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/02/romney-jeep-and-china-a-case-study-in-americas-fact-checking-fetish/273378/
StoneTools - May 10, 2013, 8:36 am
Oh, you mean like building jeeps in china? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/15/china-jeeps-fiat-chrysler-gac_n_2481642.html
Renza - May 10, 2013, 7:36 am
nah, the garbage Romney was campaigning on
StoneTools - May 10, 2013, 12:01 am
You mean the stuff that both parties are trying to shove down the military's throat?
Renza - May 9, 2013, 5:08 pm
Kinda hard to do worse than deregulate everything, f' the education system, and lets start building more military equipment that not even the military wants.
ChadAllen - May 9, 2013, 4:48 pm
You say this posing that the vacant "Hope & Change" alternative is actually worth a $hit & a better option?? You're another one of those special kinds of stupid aren't you.

DON'TCHA WORRY - Rush will be joining you soon.

TAGS: losers
Rating: 1.73/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

What liberal Democrats say when... -

TAGS: democrat party losers
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by ScatXXVII

Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 14, 2017, 7:14 pm

Subverting the censor will get you banned. strike 1.
ScatXXVII - March 12, 2017, 2:42 pm
Well now that's not funny at all. Guess you're going to have to ban yourself on general principal. And cussing, too? Tsk. Tsk. Tsk. But watching leftists heads explode over a meme is rather amusing.
BurningSlanders - March 12, 2017, 2:00 pm
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Which means the GOP is rightfully f'ucked if they don't pull of that healthcare reform. The Obamacare legislation was, after all, a Republican piece of legislation.

Winning, liberal Democrat style -

TAGS: liberal democrats brainwashed losers
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by ScatXXVII

Reality Lord - February 15, 2017, 7:59 pm


A Prophet: -

when everyone gets a trophy -

TAGS: disrespect losers
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JohnGalt

Bandit5906 - May 29, 2016, 3:07 pm
Unfortunately all to true!

Tone-Deaf Hildabeast -

Liberals and Trump -

Which Democrat Presidential Candidate Is Best Suited To Handle Terrorism? -

Obama & Dems - The Biggest Losers -

Creator of Obama 'Hope' Posters Regards Obama as a Failure -

Retribution -

TAGS: clinton democrats liberals losers despair
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by Pushkin

GaryO - November 26, 2016, 7:54 pm
Retribution my a**, it’s a reckoning

Hillary's Lie Backfires -

9/11 -

Na Na Na Na Hey Hey Hey Goodbye -

TAGS: george w jeb bush losers
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - March 1, 2016, 2:34 am
South Park has a good meme for this one.
fauxnews - February 28, 2016, 6:02 pm
That's sad news about your cat, mate. Sorry to hear about your loss. :-( Cheers
fauxnews - February 28, 2016, 6:00 pm
And that's the thing about "politics".It's always been about a classic and fatal dilemma facing humanity:the wounding challenge of battling organized malevolence.It's what "politics" is really about: slow-motion warfare accomplished by any means necessary
calron - February 26, 2016, 2:33 am
I hope we do not get President Trump because Hillary went to jail.
calron - February 26, 2016, 2:31 am
I try not to take people on the internet too seriously, though it doesn't always work. But it sometimes surprises me when people tell me what I think and manage to be utterly wrong or claim to know I'm a sock for another poster I don't even know.
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 11:02 am
The Trump phenom is everY liberal or Tea Party hater's dream come true.Until that comes to an end,very little out of here politically(let alone on a quiet website)will annoy me,let alone make me"explode"...well, maybe in laughter at the imploding GOP X-D
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 10:59 am
ever = every
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 10:59 am
The Trump phenom is ever liberal or Tea Party hater's dream come true. Until that comes to an end, very little out of here politically (let alone on a quiet website) will me annoyed, let alone "explode"...well, maybe in laughter at the imploding GOP X-D
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 10:57 am
And we'd both be lying is we said we haven't gotten under each other's skin occasionally. But since I got back, I'd be lying if I said ANYTHING has gotten under my skin, let alone you ;) Why? Trump is winning the GOP nom = BEST TEA PARTY KARMA EVER.
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 10:54 am
And the truth is, your right... in a sense.No one can ever know what another is thinking. Hey, even a broken watch is right twice a day, right? But in the spirit of the truth, it's obvious you have an axe to grind with me. Me? I love to debate this s***
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 10:52 am
*yawn* And this is where you mess up, mate. Your biggest beef with me is that I a**ume what you (or politicians) may or may not be thinking when how could I know since I'm not psychic, right? Yet, here you are a**uming (A) I'm wrong, (B) I exploded,etc.
fauxnews - February 25, 2016, 10:51 am
Nah, you are trying to have it both ways mate, as usual :-D
calron - February 25, 2016, 2:11 am
Incorrect, the found degraded pre Gulf War WMDs that would not have been part of the rational to invade. So WMDs where found, but not the ones that we went to war for and I made a joke on that and FN exploded and refused to listen to what I actual said.
calron - February 25, 2016, 2:06 am
That's a lot of angry ranting and little comprehension. "These are not the WMDs you're looking for. http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/bombshell-new-york-times-reports-wmds-found-iraq/ No, seriously they are not." Look at the part after the link.
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 8:46 pm
Ditto. P.S. Hey, that's a cute cat you got there, mate. Pet?
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:39 am
Indeed, a little common sense is in order – if U.S. troops had found WMD stockpiles, the Bush/Cheney administration would have said so. Indeed, they were desperate to do exactly that.(4/4)
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:39 am
In fact, all the reputable credible articles on the subject reference the pre-1991 inactive weapons.Everything Republicans said in the lead up to the 2003 invasion is still wrong. (3/4)
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:38 am
Critics were correct to point out that the conspiracy theorists neglected to mention that the bombs were NOT the same WMDs that Bush described; they were weapon graveyards from the 1980s and early 1990s, old weapons the west/US helped Saddam to make(2/4)
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:37 am
Remember,what Bush told the U.N. is that inspections showed that active stockpiles of VX, mustard and other chemical agents were likely hidden in Iraq and that the regime was "rebuilding and expanding" chemical weapons production facilities. Lies.(1/4)
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:34 am
...out of respect for their memory.What you're 'referring to' was US service personnel's encounters with abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq, a story that the conservatard Twittersphere and conspiracy theorists seized upon as proof that Bush was right(2/2)
fauxnews - February 24, 2016, 9:32 am
You're using slimy Bill Clinton logic to make your point."I did not have s'ex with woman!”And my zero tolerance personally for that thinking has to do with the fact-lots of good people died for Bush’s ego,it’s not a game & shouldn't be treated as one(1/2)
calron - February 24, 2016, 2:21 am
Wow, maybe you should go back and read what I said in my first reply rather than agreeing with what I actually said and then insulting me in your fury.
fauxnews - February 23, 2016, 11:00 am
They were looking for an active WMD program, not an old graveyard of bombshells that the West helped Saddam to make. Which is why Bush didn't laud this find.Just more of your tinfoil hate nonsense.You insult yourself with your thinly veiled misinformation
calron - February 23, 2016, 2:52 am
So go to the Appeal to Authority to dismiss the facts. They where not the WMD that Bush was looking for but the facts are that WMDs where found in Iraq and your personal attacks will not change that (or misrepresenting me elsewhere).
fauxnews - February 21, 2016, 11:33 pm
Dubya himself concedes he failed to find WMDs. What remains of this debate has entered the loonsville of conspiracy theory.
calron - February 21, 2016, 9:42 pm
These are not the WMDs you're looking for. http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/bombshell-new-york-times-reports-wmds-found-iraq/ No, seriously they are not.

liberal rationale -

TAGS: liberal losers climate change doesn t mean just warming
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by OTC

guest818 - May 28, 2015, 8:45 pm
Calm down, EMMa. You're going to break your keyboard.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 28, 2015, 8:41 pm
if you jiggle really hard, the but.tons will loosen up and reset.
guest818 - May 28, 2015, 8:36 pm
You've probably reached "China by now" with that hole you are digging. guess it went over your head and pushed your b***ons
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 28, 2015, 7:51 pm
also known as playing with squirrel food
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 28, 2015, 7:51 pm
You could have saved yourself a lot of typing and agonizing by just saying "Oh! I was off topic when I made the china comment" but that's not the liberal way, which requires trashing statements that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.
guest818 - May 28, 2015, 6:24 pm
"Ann Coulter, have one of your family members threatened. See how you feel! Apparently Ann Coulter made a joke about my daughter being killed in a recent column. I should expect nothing less but disgusted regardless." -- Cindy McCain
guest818 - May 28, 2015, 5:59 pm
Now this conversation is pushing your b u t t o n s. The irony. Only a self-conscious rageaholic would quote a self-conscious rageaholic like "Ann Coulter" and not see the stupidity in it. Did you get yourself a permit yet for that hole you are digging?
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 28, 2015, 5:24 pm
If you can somehow force a liberal into a point-counterpoint argument, his retorts will bear no relation to what you’ve said" -- Ann Coulter
guest818 - May 28, 2015, 9:46 am
Send us a postcard when you get to China, EMMa.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 28, 2015, 8:56 am
Faux claims my b***ons were pushed, I say they weren't, so you conclude that because I said they weren't means that they were! Public schools taught you so well.
guest818 - May 28, 2015, 1:33 am
if you have to announce to everyone your b***ons weren't pushed, then guess what? your b***ons were pushed.
rebeccaolsen - May 27, 2015, 9:54 pm
rebeccaolsen - May 27, 2015, 9:52 pm
But silly me.Clearly Im wrong since you made it clear in your epic meltdown #76504 that you "dont take this site seriously." But Im unsure if you will get this, though - you are "ignoring" me (#76501) even when you aren't(#76484). Never mind,John Kerry :)
rebeccaolsen - May 27, 2015, 9:41 pm
You accidentally responded(again)on behalf of OTC in the wrong thread,when u really meant to respond to Faux in #76503 :) Normally,I'd wager it was because your bu.ttons WERE pushed and u were so angry u were in a rush to respond,faster than u could think
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 27, 2015, 9:00 pm
*you are*
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 27, 2015, 8:59 pm
this site seriously, which I most definitely do not.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 27, 2015, 8:59 pm
If you never learn anything in your entire life, at least get smart about the fact that you totally incapable of pushing my but.tons (and probably nobody else's either) no matter how hard you try. In order for that to happen, I would have to take you and
fauxnews - May 27, 2015, 6:24 pm
Nah,wishful thinking.I just have enough sense to call a time out in a debate when it is obvious my opponent is a troll with an agenda ;-) It's actually been working out quite well for me.So what if that pushes your bu.ttons? Not my prob you blew it.Cheers
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 27, 2015, 5:31 pm
to put up an argument, but when you can't, you resort to name calling and cheesy attempts at ridiculing people. That's your biggest fault or chink in your armor.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 27, 2015, 5:30 pm
and the other thing, faux, is that I don't really like or dislike anyone on this site. I do believe, however, that some on this site have the IQ of a dead tree in the middle of a desert. Those are the people I avoid. At least you try to sometimes try
rebeccaolsen - May 27, 2015, 5:22 pm
So says the dishonest projecting lolcow. def."They've a compulsive need to give up as many lols as possible at their own expense despite themselves." Yup,that's you in a nutshell,key word 'nut'.Let us know when you're done w/your 'latest' tantrum,child :)
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 27, 2015, 4:48 pm
Is there some comment you can point to where I said I didn't like you? I do like you, you are hilarious, you bring humor and laughter to this site.
fauxnews - May 27, 2015, 4:22 pm
fauxnews - May 27, 2015, 4:17 pm
So,you dont like me.Who cares?What do you want us to do about it?lol Yes,you cant stand me.WE KNOW.You made it clear in your early posts with your new account.Whatever your strategy is here,so far its backfired on you.Get used to disappointment.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - May 27, 2015, 2:27 pm
(cont.)smart people believe in MMCC when there is plenty of actual evidence for it (more than there is than for a fairy-tale God). Maybe you SHOULD cut back on the bu.tter.lol..It's clogging them brain cells something fierce. X-D Cheers mate :-) (2/2)
fauxnews - May 27, 2015, 2:19 pm
For the record, mate: you have a literal belief in a make-believe God without a shred of real evidence. Believing in a real god is as ridiculous as believing in the tooth fairy. There is ZERO evidence for it. Yet, you think it is ridiculous that (1/2)
fauxnews - May 27, 2015, 2:16 pm
Bu.tter is your ace-in-the-hole again and again when it's really an useless card - a joker in this denier game you are playing that you are confusing with something valuable.
fauxnews - May 27, 2015, 2:11 pm
And your reb***al against the argument that you dont grasp a complex understanding of CC science was,"I didnt understand the science that BU.TTER was bad and chemicals called margarine was good,but it was wrong since science has recanted that theory"(2/2)
fauxnews - May 27, 2015, 2:08 pm
OTC,you made a poster indicting CC science as being too incompetent to separate weather from MMCC.lol Then someone called you out for not understanding the science since a smart person knows that anecdotal observations about weather aren't scientific(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - May 27, 2015, 1:54 pm
And considering it's not possible that you can smell our"breaths" from your end - given that's not how computers work and Im not there - your comeback fail is amazing as it could be only "one" person who's breath you are smelling :) BS will do that to you
rebeccaolsen - May 27, 2015, 1:34 pm
Considering how badly you rushed out your comeback without thinking, slamming the keys, stammering, and posting it twice now, it's not plausible you are taking it in stride.lol
rebeccaolsen - May 27, 2015, 1:28 pm
lol Forget who you were again? Way to undercut your own point by directing it from the wrong account :) You were sorta right, though: One of us is splitting their sides with laughter here. YOUR IRONIC KARMA FTL :D
OTC - May 27, 2015, 12:45 pm
You think but'ter is my evidence against MMCC? oh man, you really are confused, no wonder you believe in MMCC
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 27, 2015, 12:06 pm
or rational manner, I might add.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 27, 2015, 12:06 pm
oops, responded to wrong posting.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 27, 2015, 12:05 pm
Actually, that was all a waste of bad breath on your part. My comment was directed to FauxNews, not you. I normally ignore all your ignorant postings since I almost split my sides laughing at your attempts to discuss anything in a civilized manner.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 27, 2015, 12:04 pm
Actually, that was all a waste of bad breath on your part. My comment was directed to FauxNews, not you. I normally ignore all your ignorant postings since I almost split my sides laughing at your attempts to discuss anything in a civilized manner.
rebeccaolsen - May 26, 2015, 7:30 pm
You're welcome :)
rebeccaolsen - May 26, 2015, 7:30 pm
And if Einstein WAS alive today,he'd be the biggest MMCC supporter alive - given the preponderance of evidence.When deniers drop Einstein's name, I normally accuse them of talking out of their a'ss but it's silly to accuse an a'ss of talking out of itself
rebeccaolsen - May 26, 2015, 7:23 pm
Sorry to waste your time but Faux, Miss Priss, myself and many others agreed long ago, behind-the-scenes, not to click on your links. Forgot already, hun? I will thank you in advance for re-reviewing the memo.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 26, 2015, 5:53 pm
Even Einstein screwed up with his cosmological constant which he later removed from his theory of relativity
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 26, 2015, 5:42 pm
rebeccaolsen - May 26, 2015, 5:36 pm
Your "sigh" and emo logic FTW :)
rebeccaolsen - May 26, 2015, 5:36 pm
"sigh" is right.A perfect emo response given that your evidence against MMCC is EMOtional reasoning.Death cant differentiate between murder and natural causes, but forensics claim men can kill each other? Because death didn't happen before murder, right?
fauxnews - May 26, 2015, 5:09 pm
Science CAN differentiate. That's what its handy little tools and methodology is for. ;-) You just can't understand it, or are unwilling to accept it, mate. They have 10000+ studies to back them up.Your evidence against it? B.utter. I rest my case X-D
OTC - May 26, 2015, 4:30 pm
Sigh, I never said science is a hoax, try not putting words in people's mouths. Science can't differentiate natural and man made CO2, but they know man is making more of it than nature? Because there has never been climate change until MMCO2, right?
rebeccaolsen - May 26, 2015, 4:03 pm
Amen :)
fauxnews - May 26, 2015, 3:50 pm
P.S. If science was used to disprove that the bu.tter-is-bad theory was wrong, I guess logic would imply you are saying that science is at least right for the present moment- when it says b***er is good and *cough* *ahem* MMCC is unequivocal. ;-) Good job
fauxnews - May 26, 2015, 3:45 pm
Yeah, bu.tter vs. climate change. You got a real winner on your hands. Guess science is a hoax.Time to throw out all the science books and go back to church. Who knew that all we had to do was prove that bu.tter was good to prove the existence of God? :-D
OTC - May 26, 2015, 3:31 pm
I didn't understand the science that bu.tter was bad and chemicals called margarine was good, but it was wrong since science has recanted that theory, go figure
rebeccaolsen - May 25, 2015, 8:17 pm
Just because you don't understand science doesn't mean it is wrong. I bet you also had a meal sometime last week.There goes the theory that world hunger exists.ROFL I know, DebtToAmerica, this is trollbait.Sorry - couldn't resist milking our fav lolcow :)
rebeccaolsen - May 25, 2015, 8:11 pm
An uneducated and ignorant belief from an uneducated denier. Typical. This poster makes fun of itself - empirical findings of science told you that climate change/warming is unequivocally human induced, the weatherman tells you it is "cold outside."lol